CHEMICAL
OXIDATION
INTRODUCTION
Oxidation chemically
converts hazardous contaminants to non-hazardous or less toxic compounds that
are more stable, less mobile, and/or inert. The oxidizing agents most commonly
used are ozone, hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorites, chlorine, and chlorine
dioxide.
DESCRIPTION
The Chemical oxidants
most commonly employed to date include peroxide, ozone, and permanganate. These
oxidants have been able to cause the rapid and complete chemical destruction of
many toxic organic chemicals; other organics are amenable to partial
degradation as an aid to subsequent bioremediation. In general the oxidants have been capable of achieving high
treatment efficiencies (e.g., > 90 percent) for unsaturated aliphatic
(e.g., trichloroethylene [TCE]) and aromatic compounds (e.g.,
benzene), with very fast reaction rates.
Oxidation using liquid
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the presence of native or supplemental ferrous iron (Fe+2) produces Fenton’s Reagent which yields
free hydroxyl radicals (OH-). These strong, nonspecific oxidants can
rapidly degrade a variety of organic compounds. Fenton’s Reagent oxidation is
most effective under very acidic pH (e.g., pH 2 to 4) and becomes ineffective
under moderate to strongly alkaline conditions. The reactions are extremely
rapid and follow second-order kinetics. Hydroxyl radicals (.OH) generated in
Fenton’s reaction is the strongest oxidant leads to destruction and
mineralization of organic contaminants. Fenton’s
oxidation, advanced oxidation catalyzed with ferrous iron [Fe2+], is successful
in removing organics from water and soils.
The equations occurs in Fenton reactions are as follows;
Fe0
+ H2O2 Fe2
+ 2OH
Fe2+ can then react with H2O2 in traditional
Fenton’s oxidation reactions,
Fe2++ H2O2 Fe3++ OH- +.OH
Fe3+ + H2O2 Fe2+
H+ HO2-
Hydroxyl
radicals (.OH) generated in Fenton’s reaction is the strongest oxidant
leads to destruction and mineralization of organic contaminants
OXIDATION ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Advantages
· Contaminant mass can be destroyed .
· Rapid destruction/degradation of contaminants
(measurable reductions in weeks or months).
· Reduced operation and monitoring costs.
· Compatible with post treatment monitored
natural attenuation and can even enhance aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation
of residual hydrocarbons.
· Some oxidation technologies cause only
minimal disturbance to site operations.
· Disadvantages
Potentially higher initial and overall costs
relative to other source area solutions.
· Contamination in low permeability soils may
not be readily contacted and destroyed by chemical oxidants.
· Dissolved contaminant concentrations may
rebound weeks or months following chemical oxidation treatment.
· Significant health and safety concerns are
associated with applying oxidants.
APPLICATION
- effective ways to remediate petroleum contamination in soil.
- —Common method was excavation followed by land filling or incineration
- —technologies-bioremediation, soil vapor extraction, soil washing, thermal treatment and chemical oxidation
- — Chemicaloxidation may not only destroy target compounds, but also reduce toxicity associated with formulation ingredients and active agents
- — Extracted groundwater or soil vapor may be treated to remove petroleum hydrocarbons by various means such as: granular activated carbon adsorption, air stripping or others.
CONCLUSION
The most direct measurement of
the success of a chemical oxidation program is to determine whether the
groundwater and soil remedial objectives have been met and can be sustained
indefinitely following chemical oxidation treatment.
Post-application
monitoring should be conducted for a minimum of one year following chemical
oxidation treatment to confirm that short-term reductions can
be
sustained, indicating that contaminant levels have been adequately reduced
throughout the contaminated soil and
groundwater.
No comments:
Post a Comment